- Research Paper
- Open Access
Genetic signature of differential sensitivity to stevioside in the Italian population
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014
Received: 15 November 2013
Accepted: 25 March 2014
Published: 6 April 2014
The demand for diet products is continuously increasing, together with that for natural food ingredients. Stevioside and other steviol glycosides extracted from the leaves of the plant Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni are the first natural high-potency sweeteners to be approved for consumption in the United States and the European Union. However, the sweetness of these compounds is generally accompanied by aversive sensations, such as bitter and off-tastes, which may constitute a limit to their consumption. Moreover, consumers’ differences in sensitivity to high-potency sweeteners are well known, as well as difficulties in characterizing their aftertaste. Recently, TAS2R4 and TAS2R14 have been identified as the receptors that mediate the bitter off-taste of steviol glycosides in vitro. In the present study, we demonstrate that TAS2R4 gene polymorphism rs2234001 and TAS2R14 gene polymorphism rs3741843 are functional for stevioside bitterness perception.
All steviol glycosides are high-potency sweeteners, and stevioside has been reported to have a relative sweetness, compared to sucrose, between 210 and 300, depending on the protocol used (Crammer and Ikan 1987; Kinghorn and Soejarto 1986). A detailed study of concentration/response functions for several sweeteners, including stevioside, was presented by DuBois et al. (1991). The demand for this kind of sweeteners in the production of zero and reduced-calorie food products is continuously expanding as a response to increasing health awareness. Such awareness stems from a growing body of evidence showing that overweight and obesity strongly contribute to a large proportion of non-communicable diseases.
As for other high-potency sweeteners (DuBois and Prakash 2012), the sweet taste of steviol glycosides presents bitter and off-tastes (Kinghorn and Soejarto 1986; Prakash et al. 2008). Moreover, consumers’ differences in sweeteners sensitivity and acceptance, as well as the difficulties in characterizing their aftertaste, have been reported along with evidences suggesting that most of variation in sensitivity to chemical stimuli may have a genetic basis (Simons et al. 2008).
The recent introduction (2008 in USA, 2011 in EU) of purified steviol glycosides (at least 95 %) as the first natural high-potency sweeteners on the market opens up questions on the genetic basis of stevioside taste perception and its worldwide distribution. Particularly, understanding the differential ability to sense stevioside bitter aftertaste of various human populations has implications on its worldwide use as a natural sweetener and, consequently, on the diffusion of related healthy reduced-calorie food products. Bitter taste is detected by a set of 25 taste 2 receptors (TAS2R) (Meyerhof et al. 2010), and individual differences in the ability to taste substances like phenylthiocarbamide have been known since a long time (Fox 1932). Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the TAS2R38 gene have been identified as the key determinants of this capability, as well as for that of tasting the related compound 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) (Bufe et al. 2005; Kim et al. 2003; Duffy et al. 2004). In particular, PROP status (i.e., taster or non-taster) has been proposed by some authors to have a broad effect on other oral sensations and therefore has been considered a marker for food preferences and diet selection (Tepper 2008). However, this issue is highly debated as other studies showed that PROP responsiveness had no influence on food preferences (Baranowski et al. 2011).
Recently, hTAS2R4 and hTAS2R14 have been identified as the receptors that specifically mediate the bitter off-taste of steviol glycosides in vitro (Hellfritsch et al. 2012), opening the way to investigate whether variation at the genes encoding for these receptors could explain individual differences in aftertaste perception.
To date, only some SNPs in chemosensory genes have been actually associated with differential perception of bitter compounds (Allen et al. 2013a; Campbell et al. 2013; Roudnitzky et al. 2011; Reed et al. 2010; Wooding et al. 2010; Pronin et al. 2007). Nevertheless, genetic differences in sensitivity to natural bitter compounds are an aspect of great relevance considering that bitter taste receptors are expressed also in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract (and in other extra-oral tissues). In fact, the GI tract represents the key interface between food and the human body and bitter taste receptors have been proven to play a crucial role in the control of several functions, ranging from gastric emptying to appetite modulation, to the detection of ingested harmful compounds and toxins, to emesis (Reimann et al. 2012).
That being so, in this work, we set to investigate putative associations between stevioside bitter aftertaste and SNPs on genes known to be involved in bitterness perception (i.e., TAS2R4, TAS2R14 and TAS2R38), in a panel of Italian subjects. Furthermore, we explore their worldwide patterns of diversity, looking for signatures of ongoing selection at these loci that could explain potential differences in the ability to sense stevioside bitter aftertaste in different human populations.
Subjects and methods
Study design and sampled population
A total of 86 healthy adult Italian donors (48 females and 38 males) were recruited. Subjects (average age of 47 ± 14 years) were not following a prescribed diet or using drugs that might interfere with taste perception, and none of them had food allergies. In addition, individuals who smoked more than ten cigarettes per week were excluded.
A training session regarding taste perception, taste qualities and how to rate perception using the Labeled Magnitude Scale (LMS, Green et al. 1993) was performed. Volunteers were asked to refrain from eating and drinking for at least 3 h before the beginning of the session and to rinse their mouth with room temperature deionized water prior to the first and between each sample. Weight (in kg) and height (in m) were collected, in order to calculate the body mass index (BMI). For the perception test, 10 mL of a solution of stevioside 1.26 mM (Nastevia, Stevia Italia s.r.l., Italy) was used. The PROP-taster status was assessed using cotton swabs dipped in 50 mM 6-n-propylthiouracil solution (Sigma Aldrich S.r.l.) (Caremoli 2011), modifying the protocol for filter paper discs described in Zhao et al. (2003). Subjects were informed that they may receive stimuli eliciting more than one taste quality. They were asked to held the stevioside solution in the mouth for 5 s and the cotton PROP swab for 10 s. For both stimuli (i.e., stevioside and PROP), participants were allowed to choose among different tastes such as bitter, sweet or tasteless, as well as to rate their perceived intensity separately on multiple LMSs, one for each taste quality.
DNA collection, extraction, genotyping and quality control
Details of the studied SNPs in TAS2R4, TAS2R14 and TAS2R38 genes
Type of mutation
Allelic and genotypic association analyses were performed with PLINK v. 1.07 (Purcell et al. 2007) using Fisher’s exact method, and the significance threshold was adjusted according to the Bonferroni multiple testing correction (adjusted P = P value × number of individual tests). Linkage disequilibrium (LD) patterns at the TAS2R38 gene were explored by means of the solid spine approach implemented in the Haploview package (Barrett et al. 2005). The PHASE software (Stephens et al. 2001) was then used to statistically infer TAS2R38 haplotypes within the identified high-LD blocks and to reconstruct haplotype pairs for each subject. For association analyses between individual SNPs and bitterness perception, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed using STATISTICA v. 6.0 (Stat-Soft Inc, Tulsa, OK), considering age, sex and BMI as covariates. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) was carried out with Arlequin v. 3.5 (Excoffier et al. 2007 ). Exploration of worldwide variation patterns for the examined SNPs was performed using 1000 Genomes Project PHASE 1, HapMap and Human Genome Diversity Project datasets. Functional annotations and SIFT (http://sift.jcvi.org/) predictions (Kumar et al. 2009) for each SNP were retrieved from the Ensembl database (http://ensembl.org).
Assessing taste phenotypes
Volunteers involved in the study were classified, after the perception test, in different tasting categories for both PROP and stevioside. Regarding the PROP status, the distribution of PROP sensitivity showed the classical bimodal curve (Online Resource 2), with 18 individuals (20.9 %) being classified as non-tasters and 68 (79.1 %) as tasters. In order to test whether the adopted deviation from the method described in Zhao et al. (2003) could affect PROP phenotype assessment, we calculated the overall genotype–phenotype concordance (90.7 %), thus inferring the correctness of our cotton swab PROP test. After stevioside tasting, 11 individuals (13 %) were able to perceive only its bitter taste. On the contrary, 22 individuals (26 %) perceived only its sweet taste, whereas the majority of samples constituted by 53 individuals (61 %) identified a sweet taste followed by a bitter after-taste.
TAS2R4 SNP regulates the ability to perceive the bitter taste of stevioside
Distribution of TAS2R4 rs2234001 and TAS2R14 rs3741843 polymorphisms among stevioside phenotypes
TAS2R4 SNP does not predict variations in stevioside bitterness perception
We also tested whether TAS2R4 rs2234001 (C/G) could predict stevioside bitterness or sweetness. Differently than TAS2R14 rs3741843, this SNP did not show variation among different levels of bitter and sweet perception (ANCOVA, P = 0.601 and P = 0.623, respectively).
TAS2R14 SNP predicts variations in stevioside bitterness perception
We found evidence that TAS2R14 rs3741843 (A/G) has a significant impact on bitterness perception. Through comparing the “bitter-low” and “bitter-high” groups, the allelic frequency of this SNP was found to be significantly different (adjusted P = 0.002; Fisher’s exact test). In particular, the G allele was more frequent in the “bitter-high” group (n = 21) compared to the “bitter-low” one (n = 32). Genotypic analyses confirmed this statistically significant different distribution, with genotype AA being more frequent in the “bitter-low” group (adjusted P ≤ 0.001, Fisher’s exact test). The same tests were repeated by removing the LMS modal group (LMS = 50), which is suspected to introduce a confounding effect, and obtained results confirmed our previous estimation (P = 0.003 and P = 0.001, Fisher’s exact test, respectively).
TAS2R38 SNPs predict variations in PROP bitterness but not in stevioside bitterness perception
As expected, PROP-tasters and non-tasters differed significantly for TAS2R38 alleles and haplotypes. In particular, TAS2R38 rs10246939 (T/C), rs1726866 (T/C) and rs713598 (G/C) were more frequent in PROP-tasters (n = 68) compared to PROP-non-tasters (n = 18) (adjusted P < 0.001, adjusted P < 0.001, adjusted P < 0.001, Fisher’s exact tests). In the same way, perception of PROP bitterness varied with TAS2R38 haplotypes. The proline–alanine–valine (PAV) homozygotes (n = 15) reported significantly more bitterness than the heterozygotes (n = 42) (ANCOVA, P < 0.001) or the AVI (alanine, valine, and isoleucine) homozygotes (n = 24) (ANCOVA, P < 0.001). Moreover, bitterness reported by heterozygotes was similar to that reported by PAV homozygotes (ANCOVA, P = 0.345). Rare haplotypes were excluded from the analyses because they are known to have intermediate phenotypes that differ from both each other and the common haplotypes. In this study, we observed both AAI (3) and AAI/AVI (2) individuals. No associations were instead found between PROP haplotypes and stevioside bitterness (ANCOVA, P = 0.945) or sweetness (ANCOVA, P = 0.812).
Comparison between stevioside bitterness and sweetness perception
Population genetics of TAS2R4 rs2234001 and TAS2R14 rs3741843 SNPs
Alleles worldwide distribution
AMOVA performed on TAS2R14 rs3741843 and TAS2R4 rs2234001 SNPs
Among population with groups
0.19619 (P value 0.0019)
0.11754 (P value <0.001)
0.01644 (P value <0.001)
0.20940 (P value <0.001)
0.1164 (P value 0.00587)
Genetic differentiation analyses
Genome-wide pairwise Wright’s FST was calculated as a measure of genetic differentiation on 1000 Genomes populations and continental groups, and a set of relevant percentiles was extracted (Online Resource 5). FST obtained for rs3741843 and rs2234001 fell within the top percentiles (0.95) of most of the continent-wide distributions and turned out to be outlier values also for some population-level comparison.
Ancestral proportions in American 1000 Genomes populations and observed/expected frequencies of TAS2R4 rs2234001 and TAS2R14 rs3741843 SNPs
To our knowledge, this study represents the first attempt to explore genotype–phenotype association of stevioside bitter taste perception, as well its relationships with PROP phenotypes/genotypes. In fact, a previous study by Allen et al. (2013b) tested only for relationships between other steviol glycosides, RebA and RebD, and TAS2R SNPs. For this purpose, we have assayed three SNPs on TAS2R14 (rs11610105, rs3741843 and rs7138535), one on TAS2R4 (rs2234001) and three on TAS2R38 (rs10246939, rs1726866 and rs713598) genes for individual associations with stevioside perception phenotypes and for their relationships with PROP genotypes/phenotypes on a sample of 86 Italian subjects.
We confirmed the associations between PROP variants and PROP-taster status at both allelic and haplotypic levels. Surprisingly, compared to other published data reporting a correlation between PROP bitterness and intensity of different tastants, including sucrose, citric acid, sodium chloride and quinine (Hayes et al. 2008), the sweetness of aspartame (Duffy et al. 2006) and Acesulfame K (Allen et al. 2013a), as well as sweet foods, such as marshmallows and iced cakes (Lanier et al. 2005), we did not find any correlation between PROP bitterness and either stevioside sweetness or stevioside bitterness.
Stevioside perception showed great variability among the candidate subjects, with the majority of the individuals perceiving both a sweet and a bitter after-taste and some individuals being not able to perceive its bitterness or sweetness. Moreover, also bitterness intensity strongly varied across subjects. Investigating polymorphisms on TAS214 and TAS2R4 genes, which have been recently identified as the loci encoding for receptors that mediate the bitter off-taste of steviol glycosides in vitro (Hellfritsch et al. 2012), our results suggest that two SNPs (rs2234001 and rs3741843) contribute to the perceived bitterness of stevioside in humans. After phenotype identification, we showed that TAS2R4 rs2234001 varies among people who were able to perceive or not the bitter taste of stevioside. Specifically, our results demonstrate that the G allele of this locus was associated with capability to perceive bitter after-taste of stevioside, while the C allele was more abundant in subjects who could not perceive it. At the genotype level, the recessive homozygote status GG was associated with the ability to perceive the bitter taste of stevioside, while the dominant CC homozygote status was associated with the inability.
In addition, when comparing strong and low bitter stevioside perceptions, one SNP located on the TAS2R14 gene (rs3741843) showed significant frequency differences. In particular, its G allele was associated with a stronger bitter perception. In order to confirm this, we tried to verify whether perception of stevioside bitterness varied with the genotype and, as a matter of fact, the AA genotype turned out to be strongly correlated with lower values of bitter perception. Regarding PROP status, we did not find any relationships with neither stevioside perception nor the TAS2R4/14 studied SNPs, although minimal evidence that the rs3741843 AA genotype is predictive of PROP bitterness was observed.
While variation at rs3741843 locus was not linked with any protein modification, we found that not only rs2234001 is a non-synonymous (albeit not deleterious) SNP, but that it is also in strong LD (r 2 > 0.9) with two other deleterious mutations in CEU (Northern Europeans from Utah). Both such polymorphisms (rs2227264 and rs2233998) were found to be associated with eating behavior (Dotson et al. 2010), while only rs2227264 has been proved to be related to the perceived bitterness of the espresso coffee (Hayes et al. 2011), hence representing putative functional candidates for the reported genotype–phenotype association.
Patterns of worldwide variation of two SNPs related to stevioside perception, together with comparison of their pairwise population Fst values with empirical genome wide distributions, highlighted great variability levels within human populations. In particular, rs2234001 showed a significant differentiation between African-Asian groups (P = 0.05), but not between Asian-European ones (P = 0.10), while rs3741843 was highly differentiated between African-Asian (P = 0.025) and African-European (P = 0.05) groups (Table S5). Furthermore, considering the 10 kbp haplotypes centered on the rs3741843 locus, the modal haplotype class broadly differed between African and European populations (Online Resource 6).
The strong differentiation between African and European groups for this latter SNP allowed us to detect a 61 % excess of the African variant in Puertoricans, after accounting for their history of genetic admixture. The enrichment of the African component in Puertoricans may suggest the presence of some natural or social selective pressure acting on such variant after its arrival in their genic pool some 200 ya (Kidd et al. 2012). Such selective pressure could perhaps be related with cultural/dietary shifts caused by the introduction of African traditions at the time of their arrival in Puerto Rico. While these results might be affected by our choice of using the corrected Mexicans as proxy for the ancestral American components, we believe such choice to be conservative given that only two observed–expected pairs showed an excess higher than 20 %.
In conclusion, we found genotype–phenotype associations between stevioside perception and SNPs at the TAS2R4 and TAS2R14 genes, which are significantly differentiated worldwide. This finding and the strong LD of one of these variants with deleterious mutations suggest a role played by natural selection in shaping the current patterns of variation observed in different human groups.
We are very grateful to the “Slow Food Communities,” Silvano Zaccone, Luisella Verderi and to all the people who agreed to participate to this study. This work was supported by the Fondazione Del Monte “Taste Genetic Geography” Grant to DL and by The Wellcome Trust (098051) to LP.
Davide Risso, Gabriella Morini, Luca Pagani, Andrea Quagliariello, Cristina Giuliani, Sara De Fanti, Marco Sazzini, Donata Luiselli and Sergio Tofanelli declare that they have no conflict of interest. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Ethics Committee of the University of Bologna and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects for being included in the study.
- Allen AL, McGeary JE, Knopik VS, Hayes JE (2013a) Bitterness of the non-nutritive acesulfame potassium varies with polymorphisms in TAS2R9 and TAS2R31. Chem Senses 38(5):379–389PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Allen AL, McGeary JE, Hayes J (2013b) Rebaudioside A and Rebaudioside D bitterness do not covary with Acesulfame-K bitterness or polymorphisms in TAS2R9 and TAS2R31. Chemosens Percept 6(3):109–117View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Baranowski et al (2011) 6-n-propylthiouracil taster status not related to reported cruciferous vegetable intake among ethnically diverse children. Nutr Res 31(8):594–600PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barrett JC, Fry B, Malle J, Daly MJ (2005) Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics 21(2):263–265Google Scholar
- Bufe B, Breslin PA, Kuhn C, Reed DR, Tharp CD, Slack JP, Kim UK, Drayna D, Meyerhof W (2005) The molecular basis of individual differences in phenylthiocarbamide and propylthiouracil bitterness perception. Curr Biol 15:322–327PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Campbell MC, Ranciaro A et al (2013) Origin and differential selection of allelic variation at TAS2R16 associated with salicin bitter taste sensitivity in Africa. Mol Biol Evol 31(2):288–302PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Caremoli F (2011) Bitter taste perception: a preliminary study of the effects on food preferences and potential applications in human nutrition. Master’s Thesis in Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Milan, Italy Google Scholar
- Crammer B, Ikan R (1987) Progress in the chemistry and properties of the rebaudiosides. In: Grenby TH (ed) Developments in sweeteners. Elsevier Applied Science, London, pp 45–64Google Scholar
- Dotson C, Shaw H, Mitchell B, Munger S, Steinle N (2010) Variation in the gene TAS2R38 is associated with the eating behavior disinhibition in old order Amish women. Appetite 54(1):93–99PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- DuBois G, Prakash I (2012) Non-caloric sweeteners, sweetness modulators, and sweetener enhancers. Ann Rev Food Sci Technol 3:353–380View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- DuBois GE, Walters DE, Schiffman SS, Warwick ZS, Booth BJ, Pecore SD, Gibes K, Carr BT, Brands LM (1991) Concentration-response relationships of sweeteners. A systematic study. In: Walters DE, Orthoefer F, DuBois GE (eds) Sweeteners: discovery, molecular design and chemoreception, American Chemical Society Symposium Series 450. ACS Books, Washington, pp 261–276View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Duffy VB, Davidson AC, Kidd JR, Kidd KK, Speed WC, Pakstis AJ, Reed DR, Snyder DJ, Bartoshuk LM (2004) Bitter receptor gene (TAS2R38), 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) bitterness and alcohol intake.Alcohol Clin Exp Res 28(11):1629–1637Google Scholar
- Duffy VB, Hayes JE, Dinehart ME (2006) Genetic differences in sweet taste perception. In: Spillane WJ (ed) Optimising the sweet taste in foods. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, pp 30–53View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2007) Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform Online 23(1):47–50Google Scholar
- Fox AL (1932) The relationship between chemical constitution and taste. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 18:115–120PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Green BG, Shaffer GS, Gilmore MM (1993) Derivation and evaluation of a semantic scale of oral sensation magnitude with apparent ratio properties. Chem Senses 18(6):683–702View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hayes JE, Bartoshuk LM, Kidd JR, Duffy VB (2008) Supertasting and PROP bitterness depends on more than the TAS2R38 gene. Chem Senses 33(3):255–265PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hayes JE, Wallace MR, Knopik VS, Herbstman DM, Bartoshuk LM, Duffy VB (2011) Allelic variation in TAS2R bitter receptor genes associates with variation in sensations from and ingestive behaviors toward common bitter beverages in adults. Chem Senses 36(3):311–319PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hellfritsch C, Brockhoff A, Stähler F, Meyerhof W, Hofmann T (2012) Human psychometric and taste receptor responses to steviol glycosides. J Agric Food Chem 60:6782–6793Google Scholar
- Kidd J, Gravel S, Byrnes J et al (2012) Population genetic inference from personal genome data: impact of ancestry and admixture on human genomic variation. Am J Hum Genet 91(4):660–671PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim UK, Jorgenson E, Coon H, Leppert M, Risch N, Drayna D (2003) Positional cloning of the human quantitative trait locus underlying taste sensitivity to phenylthiocarbamide. Science 299(5610):1221–1225PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kinghorn AD (2002) The genus Stevia. Taylor & Francis, LondonView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kinghorn AD, Soejarto DD (1986) Sweetening agents of plant origin. Crit Rev Plant Sci 4:79–120View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kumar P, Henikoff S, Ng P (2009) Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat Protoc 4:1073–1081PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lanier SA, Hayes JE, Duffy VB (2005) Sweet and bitter tastes of alcoholic beverages mediate alcohol intake in of-age undergraduates. Physiol Behav 83(5):821–831PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Meyerhof W, Batram C, Kuhn C, Brockhoff A, Chudoba E, Bufe B, Appendino G, Behrens M (2010) The molecular receptive ranges of human TAS2R bitter taste receptors. Chem Senses 35(2):157–170PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Prakash I, DuBois GE, Clos JF, Wilkens KL, Fosdick LE (2008) Development of rebiana, a natural non-caloric sweetener. Food Chem Toxicol 46(Suppl. 7S):75–82View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pronin AN, Xu H, Tang H, Zhang L, Li Q, Li X (2007) Specific alleles of bitter receptor genes influence human sensitivity to the bitterness of aloin and saccharin. Curr Biol 17:1403–1408PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, Bender D, Maller J, Sklar P, de Bakker PI, Daly MJ, Sham PC (2007) PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet 81(3):559–575PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Reed DR, Zhu G, Breslin PA, Duke FF, Henders AK, Campbell MJ, Montgomery GW, Medland SE, Martin NG, Wright MJ (2010) The perception of quinine taste intensity is associated with common genetic variants in a bitter receptor cluster on chromosome 12. Hum Mol Genet 19(21):4278–4285PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Reimann F, Tolhurst G, Gribble FM (2012) G-protein-coupled receptors in intestinal chemosensation. Cell Metab 15:421–431PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Roudnitzky N, Bufe B, Thalmann S, Kuhn C, Gunn H, Xing C, Crider B, Behrens M, Meyerhof W, Wooding S (2011) Genomic, genetic and functional dissection of bitter taste responses to artificial sweeteners. Hum Mol Genet 20(17):3437–3449PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Simons CT, Adam C, LeCourt G, Crawford c, Ward C, Meyerhof W, Slack JP (2008) The “bitter-sweet” truth of artificial sweeteners. In: DuBois G, Weerasinghe DK (eds) Sweetness and sweeteners. Biology, chemistry, and psychophysics. American Chemical Society, Washington, pp 335–354Google Scholar
- Skotte L, Korneliussen TS, Albrechtsen A (2013) estimating individual admixture proportions from next generation sequencing data. Genetics 195(3):693–702PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stephens M, Smith NJ, Donnelly P (2001) A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data. Am J Hum Genet 68(4):978–989PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tepper BJ (2008) Nutritional implications of genetic taste variation: the role of PROP sensitivity and other taste phenotypes. Annu Rev Nutr 28:367–388PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium (2012) An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes. Nature 491:56–65PubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vega-Gálvez A, Lemus-Mondaca R, Zura-Bravo L, Ah-Hen K (2012) Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni, source of a high-potency natural sweetener: a comprehensive review on the biochemical, nutritional and functional aspects. Food Chem 132:1121–1132View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wooding S, Gunn H, Ramos P, Thalmann S, Xing C, Meyerhof W (2010) Genetics and bitter taste responses to goitrin, a plant toxin found in vegetables. Chem Senses 35(8):685–692PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yadav KS, Guleria P (2012) Steviol glycosides from Stevia: biosynthesis pathway review and their application in foods and medicine. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 52:988–998PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhao L, Kirkmeyera S, Tepper B (2003) A paper screening test to assess genetic taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil. Physiol Behav 78:625–633PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar