Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of mean ± SD of body weight, FI, and BMI before and after intervention

From: The impact of vitamin D on type 2 diabetes management: boosting PTP1B gene expression and physical activity benefits in rats

Variables

D + AT + Vit D

D + AT

D + Vit D

D + C

NC

p-valuea

Body weight (g)

 Before

305.70 ± 2.90

308.10 ± 2.80

303.80 ± 2.78

304.70 ± 1.88

207.60 ± 3.80

0.001Â¥

 After

250.50 ± 5.79

263.80 ± 2.78

286 ± 3.19

322.90 ± 3.60

213.50 ± 4.35

Δ

 − 55.20 ± 2.89α¥€£

 − 44.30 ± 0.02¥€£

 − 17.80 ± 0.41€£

 − 18.20 ± 1.72£

5.90 ± 0.55

P†

0.001*

0.001*

0.001*

0.001*

0.009*

 

FI (g/day)

 Before

15.17 ± 0.026

15.30 ± 0.029

15.14 ± 0.018

15.18 ± 0.024

14.64 ± 0.048

 

 After

15.11 ± 0.024

15.23 ± 0.033

15.11 ± 0.025

15.61 ± 0.045

14.70 ± 0.030

0.002Â¥

Δ

 − 0.06 ± 0.02€£

 − 0.07 ± 0.04€£

 − 0.03 ± 0.07€£

0.7 ± 0.01£

0.06 ± 0.018

 

P†

0.002*

0.002*

0.002*

0.001*

0.023*

 

BMI (kg/m2)

 Before

0.74 ± 0.033

0.76 ± 0.019

0.77 ± 0.021

0.76 ± 0.030

0.52 ± 0.016

0.011Â¥

 After

0.61 ± 0.015

0.65 ± 0.011

0.71 ± 0.026

0.80 ± 0.016

0.53 ± 0.014

Δ

 − 0.13 ± 0.018α¥€£

 − 0.11 ± 0.008¥€£

 − 0.06 ± 0.005€£

0.04 ± 0.014

0.01 ± 0.002

P†

0.001*

0.001*

0.005*

0.006*

0.013*

 
  1. D + AT + Vit D Diabetic + aerobic training + vitamin D supplement, D + AT Diabetic + aerobic training, D + Vit D Diabetic + vitamin D supplement, D + C Diabetic + control, NC Nondiabetic control
  2. *Data analysis was done by the analysis of one-way analysis of variance test followed by post hoc Tukey’s test. P†Statistical analysis was done by paired sample t-test. *Significantly different in comparison pre- and post within the groups. ¥Significantly different comparing Δ between groups
  3. αSignificantly different compared to AT. ¥Significantly different compared to vit D. €Significantly different compared to C. £Significantly different compared to NC